return to "The History and Conservation of Glass Supported and Protected Photographs"
return to Research from the Andrew W. Mellon Advanced Residency Program in Photograph Conservation at George Eastman House 1999-2009
Contents |
The ambrotype was removed from the frame and opened from the back of the passépartout. The housing was cleaned and a new backing of acrylic velvet paper was placed behind the image plate.
Previous Treatment: The original backing of the passé partout (European) has been replaced with a brown paper and the entire package has been placed in a later period, Ogee style (American) frame.
Housing:
Passé-partout: The original binding tape is present and torn at the corners and along
the edges. The cover glass is in fair condition with some mild deterioration on the
inner surface and soiling on the outer surface. The window mat is in very good
condition
Frame: The backing board is warped, stained and held in with two modern nails. The
plate housing is shored into the frame with two ball-point pens.
Image Plate: Upon initial examination, the binder and image are in very good condition.
The black backing material is flaking with some losses. The image plate was coated
with asphalt on the emulsion side.
This was a rather simple and highly successful treatment. The visual continuity of the image plate was renewed with minimal impact on the original object materials.
Notes on reticulating black varnish
Reticulating varnish has traditionally thought to be the result of poorly
formulated varnish. However, there is evidence that some reticulation may be caused
by glass deterioration beneath the varnish[1]. Varnish can undergo some plastic
deformation, causing air pockets between the glass and varnish that appear as
distracting lighter areas when the plate is viewed. In other cases, the varnish may crack
first, allowing the ingress of moisture and resulting in hydrolytic glass deterioration,
compounding the problem.
Various modern varnishes have been recommended for the replacement of
reticulating historic varnishes. However, glass deterioration will affect the new varnish
with any fluctuations in relative humidity. Stabilization at the proper relative humidity
will mitigate additional corrosion.
The introduction of a separate black backing, such as acrylic (non-hygroscopic)
black velvet, will restore the aesthetics of the plate without disturbing the historic
varnish. Additionally, the introduction of B-72 into the air pockets is another option to
stabilize the reticulating varnish. However, this non-reversible treatment can be very
delicate and time consuming.
Chemical analysis[2], conducted by Susie Clark in 1998, of black varnish has
shown the layers to consist of shellac, soot and lamp black. The research goes on to
suggest either the use of modern materials such as a mixture of carbon black and B-72 in
acetone or a traditional mixture of shellac in methylated spirits and carbon black for the in-painting of lost black varnish. While these are viable options, these alternatives obliterate the original backing.
Katharine Whitman, was an ARP fellow from 2005 to 2007. In her capstone project, Kate looks at a little understood photographic support materials, glass. Currently Kate is the Conservator of Photographs at the Art Gallery of Ontario in Toronto, Canada.